avia.wikisort.org - Aeroplane

The Rockwell XFV-12 was a prototype supersonic United States Navy fighter which was built in 1977. The XFV-12 design attempted to combine the Mach 2 speed and AIM-7 Sparrow armament of the McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II in a VTOL (vertical takeoff and landing) fighter for the small Sea Control Ship which was under study at the time. On paper, it looked superior to the subsonic Hawker Siddeley Harrier attack fighter. However it was unable to demonstrate an untethered vertical takeoff and its inability to meet performance requirements terminated the program.

XFV-12
XFV-12A on ramp at NAA in Columbus, Ohio
Role	VTOL fighter Type of aircraft
Manufacturer	Rockwell International
Status	Cancelled (1981)
Primary user	United States Navy
Number built	1

Design and development

In 1972, the Navy issued a request for proposals for a next generation supersonic V/STOL fighter/attack aircraft. Rockwell's design with the XFV-12 won against Convair's proposal with the Convair Model 200.[1] The XFV-12A, despite its concept being considered risky compared to that of the Harrier, was selected for development.[2]

To reduce costs, the nose from a Douglas A-4 Skyhawk and intakes from the F-4 were used. Engine rig testing began in 1974.[3]^{[permanent dead link]} Free-flight model tests conducted at the NASA Langley full-scale wind tunnel showed the projected thrust augmentation levels were highly optimistic, and that the aircraft would most likely be incapable of vertical flight on the thrust available, while the design remained suitable for conventional flight.[2]

The XFV-12 used a thrust augmented wing concept[3] in which exhaust would be directed through spaces in a wing opened up like venetian blinds to increase available lift, somewhat like Lockheed's unsuccessful XV-4 Hummingbird. Such arrangement restricted weapons carriage to under the narrow fuselage and two conformal missile mounts. Its canards were extremely large, with almost 50% of the area of the wings, making it effectively a tandem wing. The 30,000 lbf (130 kN)-class afterburning turbofan engine had enough thrust to lift the weight of the 20,000 lb (9,072 kg) aircraft. It was modified to further increase thrust for vertical lift. The rear engine exhaust was closed and the gases redirected through ducts to ejector nozzles in the wings and canards for vertical lift.

Operational history

Ground testing of the XFV-12A began in July 1977, and the aircraft was officially rolled out at the Rockwell International facility in Columbus, Ohio on 26 August.[2] Due to increasing costs, construction of the second prototype was abandoned.[2]

Tethered hover tests were conducted in 1978.[2] Over the course of six months, it was determined that the XFV-12A design suffered from major deficiencies with regard to vertical flight, especially a lack of sufficient vertical thrust.[2] Lab tests showed 55% thrust augmentation should be expected; however, differences in the scaled-up system dropped augmentation levels to 19% for the wing and a mere 6% in the canard.[2] While the augmenters did work as expected, the extensive ducting of the propulsion system degraded thrust, and in the end the power-to-weight ratio was such that the engine was capable of vertically lifting only 75% of the weight of the aircraft in which it was mounted.[2]

Following the tests, and with the program suffering from cost overruns, the Navy decided the XFV-12A was not worth further development, and cancelled the project in 1981.[2] The October 6, 1975 issue of Aviation Week published an article about the Rockwell NA-382 which was an even more ambitious proposal to the Marine Corps to fit a similar wing to the Lockheed C-130 Hercules, but the plan never made it off the drawing board.[4]

Of the two prototypes built, only one was completed, while the second prototype was cancelled.[5]

The United States Marine Corps eventually adopted the subsonic British-designed Harrier, the only truly successful V/STOL design of the 1960s. Its replacement, the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II, uses a shaft-driven fan and a swivelling rear nozzle to achieve vertical landing. It is designed for supersonic and vertical flight with performance just over Mach 1.5 with weapons and range comparable to the older F-4 and F-18.

Surviving aircraft

Following program cancellation, the aircraft was disassembled and the cockpit section of the fuselage was stored at NASA's Plum Brook Station in Sandusky, Ohio. As of May 2012, a group of high school students at the EHOVE Career Center, with guidance from NASA contractor personnel, were to restore the fuselage for use as a museum display.[6][7]^{[needs update]}

Specifications

Data from Jane's All the World's Aircraft 1979–80,[8] Jane's All the World's Aircraft 1980–81[9]

General characteristics

• Crew: 1
• Length: 43 ft 11 in (13.39 m)
• Wingspan: 28 ft 6.25 in (8.6932 m)
• Height: 10 ft 4 in (3.15 m)
• Wing area: 293 sq ft (27.2 m²)
• Empty weight: 13,800 lb (6,260 kg)
• Gross weight: 19,500 lb (8,845 kg)
• Max takeoff weight: 24,250 lb (11,000 kg)
• Fuel capacity: 2,763 l (730 US gal; 608 imp gal) in two fuselage bladder tanks and two integral wing tanks
• Powerplant: 1 × Pratt & Whitney F401-PW-400 afterburning turbofan engine, 30,000 lbf (130 kN) with afterburner

Performance

• Maximum speed: Mach 2.2-2.4
• Thrust/weight: 1.5 (conventional)
  
• Take-off run: 300 ft (91 m) at 24,250 lb (11,000 kg)

Armament

• Guns: 1 20 mm M61 Vulcan cannon, 639 rounds
• Missiles: 2 AIM-7 Sparrow (carried under fuselage) and 2 AIM-9L Sidewinder AAMs or 4 AIM-7s

See also

• Sea Control Ship

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era

• Hawker Siddeley Harrier
• VFW VAK 191B

Related lists

• List of fighter aircraft
• List of military aircraft of the United States
• List of VTOL aircraft

References

Notes

Bibliography

• Buttler, Tony. American Secret Projects, Fighters & Interceptors 1945-1978. Hinckley, UK: Midland Publishing. 2007. ISBN 1-85780-264-0.
• Winchester, Jim. X-Planes and Prototypes. Barnes and Noble Books.
• Willis, David (2006). "V for Variety, part one". Air Enthusiast. Key Publishing. July/August 2006 (124): 55–65. ISSN 0143-5450.
• "XFV-12A V/Stol in need of a lift". Flight International: 171. 20 January 1979. Archived from the original on 1 June 2012.

External links

• Line illustration of the Rockwell XFV-12
• Illustration of XFV-12 engine airflow

На других языках

---

[de] Rockwell XFV-12

Die North American Rockwell XFV-12 war ein für den Einsatz bei der US-Navy vorgesehenes Überschall-VTOL-Kampfflugzeugprojekt. Der Entwurf NR-356 von North American Aviation setzte sich gegen 10 weitere Vorschläge,[1] zu denen z. B. die Convair Model 200 gehörte, durch. Die Entwicklung der XFV-12 begann 1972 und war als Ergänzung für die AV-8 Harrier gedacht. Diese sollte dann ausschließlich für Luft-Boden-Einsätze eingesetzt werden, wohingegen der XFV-12 die Luftraumsicherung zugedacht war. Wie die Harrier sollte auch die XFV-12 auf amphibischen Angriffsschiffen stationiert werden.

---

- [en] Rockwell XFV-12

---

[fr] Rockwell XFV-12

Le Rockwell XFV-12 est un prototype d'avion à décollage et atterrissage vertical conçu par Rockwell International en 1977. Sa conception avait pour objectif de combiner les capacités de vitesse et d'emport du McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II, le tout dans un appareil VTOL pour embarquer sur le Sea Control Ship alors en projet à cette époque. Les capacités de décollage vertical ne furent pas démontrées, et le projet fut abandonné.

---

[it] Rockwell XFV-12

Il Rockwell XFV-12 fu un prototipo di caccia supersonico per la Marina U.S., che venne costruito nel 1977. Lo XFV-12 combinava la velocità Mach 2 e l'armamento di AIM-7 Sparrow dell'F-4 Phantom II in un velivolo da caccia con caratteristiche VTOL (decollo e atterraggio verticale) destinato alle piccole Sea Control Ship che erano sotto studio a quel tempo. Sulla carta, appariva superiore in quanto a prestazioni all'aereo da attacco subsonico Hawker Siddeley Harrier. Sfortunatamente la spinta non fu mai sufficiente per il decollo verticale, anche se il motore installato aveva maggiore potenza del peso del velivolo, ed il progetto fu abbandonato.

---

---